Retrospective observational study evaluates sex-related ocular biometry differences in cataract candidates, indicating significant implications for surgery planning.
INTRODUCTION: Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) selection in cataract surgery relies on precise ocular biometry, yet variability between patients remains a challenge in achieving optimal refractive outcomes. Sex-related differences in biometric parameters and age-related changes in corneal astigmatism may contribute to this variability. This study aimed to evaluate sex-related differences in ocular biometry and age-related astigmatic changes in Greek cataract candidates using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 6258 eyes from 3726 adult patients. Patients were scheduled for cataract surgery between July 2024 and July 2025 at a tertiary eye hospital in Athens, Greece. Axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), keratometry (K1, K2), corneal astigmatism (CA), and white-to-white (WTW) were measured using the Argos SS-OCT biometer. Predicted IOL power distribution was evaluated using the Hoffer Q formula for descriptive purposes, targeting emmetropia. Sex- and age-stratified analyses were performed. RESULTS: Male eyes demonstrated longer AL (by 0.46 mm), deeper ACD (by 0.13 mm), and larger WTW (by 0.20 mm) (p < 0.01), whereas female eyes had steeper K1 (by 0.78 D) and K2 (by 0.70 D) (p < 0.01). An age-related shift from with-the-rule (WTR) to against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism was observed in both sexes, occurring approximately one decade earlier in male eyes. Female eyes were overrepresented below the 5th (5.54% vs. 4.00%, p < 0.01) and above the 95th (4.42% vs. 2.88%, p < 0.01) percentiles of the predicted IOL power distribution. CONCLUSION: Sex-related differences in ocular biometry and age-related changes in corneal astigmatism were observed in this cohort. These findings provide population-specific data and highlight variability in biometric characteristics among patients with cataracts which may be relevant for preoperative assessment and surgery planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: