This note defines par-equivalent tees to equalize expected gross score in golfers of varying skill levels, suggesting a new approach to competition design.
This note defines a player's par-equivalent tee as the course length at which that player profile's expected gross score equals par. The idea is not that a shorter course is always "fair," nor that tee selection can replace the World Handicap System. Rather, tee selection is treated as an ex ante instrument for removing mean-score differences before the round begins. Using a shot-level golf simulator with expected-score-minimizing shot targets and minimum-mean strategy selection, I scale two synthetic par-72 courses--one smooth and one hazard-intensive--and solve for the length that makes Tour, scratch, HCP10, and HCP20 profiles average 72. The resulting yardages are strongly ordered by skill, but not proportional to driver distance: the HCP20 profile averages par only at extremely short lengths, about 2,275 yards on the smooth course and 1,778 yards on the hazard course. Once player-specific tees equalize expected gross score, centered head-to-head gross matches are essentially balanced, suggesting that variance and tail risk become the next objects of competition design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel A. B. Dias (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: