Analytical evaluation investigates how cable corrosion affects prestressing in concrete elements, indicating significant implications for bridge maintenance.
The paper provides an original analytical evaluation of the effects of cable corrosion on the prestressing coactive state in post-tensioned concrete elements (namely, beams and stays in prestressed bridges), in which steel cables are made adherent through subsequent cast-in-situ grouting. The corrosion is assumed to be homogeneously distributed over a finite portion of the sheathing duct characterized by lack of mortar injection, and modeled as a uniform cross-section loss. The study analytically demonstrates that the reduction of the cross-sectional area of the prestressing steel cables due to corrosion generates both (I) a loss of the prestressing force and (II) a stress redistribution within the residual cross-sectional area of the cables, which are limited to the zone lacking grouting. Ready-to-use closed-form mathematical expressions for these two effects are derived allowing direct quantification of the corrosion-induced variation of the prestressing state, for the two cases of concentric and eccentric tendons, and validated against experimental results available in the scientific literature. A numerical application to three typical existing bridge elements is also provided. The fundamental result is that the loss of the prestressing force is approximately equal to the cross-section loss, while the stress redistribution is comparatively small, providing a cable stress increase below 5% for bridge decks and below 25% for stays, even for highly corroded cables. • Original analytical model assesses corrosion effects in post-tensioned elements. • Corrosion is modeled as uniform steel loss in ungrouted duct sections. • Closed-form solutions quantify prestressing force loss and stress redistribution. • Models developed for both concentric and eccentric tendon configurations. • Prestress loss roughly equal to cross-section loss; dominates over stress increase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: