Finds two solutions to the invariable plane–Sedna degeneracy, implying improved understanding of orbital stability.
Paper XIV of the ATMAN v5.0 series. The invariable plane–Sedna degeneracy of Paper XIII is resolved through three successive analyses. First, a 2D joint sweep over iSolB∈[0°,5°] and iP3∈[0°,10°] (121 trials) confirms no solution exists in the low-inclination regime. Second, an extended 1D sweep over iP3∈[10°,25°] identifies two solutions satisfying both constraints simultaneously: iP3=16° (ΔqSedna=+6.47au) and iP3=20° (ΔqSedna=+7.50au). Third, a fine sweep (Δi=0.1°) over iP3∈[15°,17.1°] cartographs the Kozai–Lidov resonance window, revealing a fringe structure of width ΔiKL=1.4° with maximum lifting ΔqSedna=+8.30au at iP3=17.1°. A 100 Myr stability integration with optimal inclinations (iSolB=1.5°, iErebo=30°, iP3=16°) confirms zero orbital drift for Erebo (a=715.21±0.00au) and P3 (a=1039.93±0.00au) and sustained Kuiper Cliff depletion Ddep=0.654. Definitive model: iSolB=1.5°, iErebo=30°, iP3=16°–17.1°. SHA-256 fine sweep: 6a9557ed7fea27d209a6b07f1f989f9a95c53cf17c33fe00d695292242a77caa. SHA-256 stability: 83b9d903af42de7d5df020ed5b3ea0a298371cefe8ac09ab8ee5874e2a15327b. Paper XIV of the ATMAN v5.0 series.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ariel Fernando Martini (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: