Current smoking (RHR 1.45; 95% CI 1.27-1.66) and hypertension conferred a greater excess risk of myocardial infarction in women than men, whereas lipid metrics were stronger risk determinants for men.
Cohort (n=363,313)
Yes
Incident myocardial infarction and stroke (n=363,313)
Vascular risk factors vs Men vs Women
Incident myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke — RHR 1.45 (1.27-1.66)
Effect estimate: RHR 1.45 (95% CI 1.27-1.66)
AIM: This study examined sex-based differences in associations of vascular risk factors with incident cardiovascular events in the UK Biobank. METHODS: Baseline participant demographic, clinical, laboratory, anthropometric, and imaging characteristics were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate independent associations of vascular risk factors with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke for men and women. Women-to-men ratios of hazard ratios (RHRs), and related 95% confidence intervals, represent the relative effect-size magnitude by sex. RESULTS: Among the 363 313 participants (53.5% women), 8470 experienced MI (29.9% women) and 7705 experienced stroke (40.1% women) over 12.66 11.93, 13.38 years of prospective follow-up. Men had greater risk factor burden and higher arterial stiffness index at baseline. Women had greater age-related decline in aortic distensibility. Older age RHR: 1.02 (1.01-1.03), greater deprivation RHR: 1.02 (1.00-1.03), hypertension RHR: 1.14 (1.02-1.27), and current smoking RHR: 1.45 (1.27-1.66) were associated with a greater excess risk of MI in women than men. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with excess MI risk in men RHR: 0.90 (0.84-0.95) and apolipoprotein A (ApoA) was less protective for MI in women RHR: 1.65 (1.01-2.71). Older age was associated with excess risk of stroke RHR: 1.01 (1.00-1.02) and ApoA was less protective for stroke in women RHR: 2.55 (1.58-4.14). CONCLUSION: Older age, hypertension, and smoking appeared stronger drivers of cardiovascular disease in women, whereas lipid metrics appeared stronger risk determinants for men. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific preventive strategies and suggest priority targets for intervention in men and women.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Remfry et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Incident myocardial infarction and stroke (n=363,313). Vascular risk factors vs. Men vs Women was evaluated on Incident myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke (RHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.27-1.66). Current smoking (RHR 1.45; 95% CI 1.27-1.66) and hypertension conferred a greater excess risk of myocardial infarction in women than men, whereas lipid metrics were stronger risk determinants for men.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c4e03e28175e95a234579 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad029
Elizabeth Remfry
Queen Mary University of London
Maddalena Ardissino
University of Cambridge
Celeste McCracken
Cardiac Imaging
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
University of Oxford
Imperial College London
University of Manchester
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: