Key result
Current smoking links to ~45% greater excess MI risk in women than men.
Why the study?
This study examined sex-based differences in associations of vascular risk factors with incident cardiovascular events.
Are there sex-based differences in the associations of vascular risk factors with incident myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke?
Cohort (n=363,313)
Yes
Are there sex-based differences in the associations of vascular risk factors with incident myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke?
Effect estimate: RHR 1.45 (95% CI 1.27-1.66)
Older age, hypertension, and smoking are stronger drivers of cardiovascular disease in women, whereas lipid metrics are stronger risk determinants for men, highlighting the need for sex-specific preventive strategies.
May inform sex-specific MI risk counseling; leaves open whether tailored prevention improves outcomes.
AIM: This study examined sex-based differences in associations of vascular risk factors with incident cardiovascular events in the UK Biobank. METHODS: Baseline participant demographic, clinical, laboratory, anthropometric, and imaging characteristics were collected. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate independent associations of vascular risk factors with incident myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke for men and women. Women-to-men ratios of hazard ratios (RHRs), and related 95% confidence intervals, represent the relative effect-size magnitude by sex. RESULTS: Among the 363 313 participants (53.5% women), 8470 experienced MI (29.9% women) and 7705 experienced stroke (40.1% women) over 12.66 [11.93, 13.38] years of prospective follow-up. Men had greater risk factor burden and higher arterial stiffness index at baseline. Women had greater age-related decline in aortic distensibility. Older age [RHR: 1.02 (1.01-1.03)], greater deprivation [RHR: 1.02 (1.00-1.03)], hypertension [RHR: 1.14 (1.02-1.27)], and current smoking [RHR: 1.45 (1.27-1.66)] were associated with a greater excess risk of MI in women than men. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with excess MI risk in men [RHR: 0.90 (0.84-0.95)] and apolipoprotein A (ApoA) was less protective for MI in women [RHR: 1.65 (1.01-2.71)]. Older age was associated with excess risk of stroke [RHR: 1.01 (1.00-1.02)] and ApoA was less protective for stroke in women [RHR: 2.55 (1.58-4.14)]. CONCLUSION: Older age, hypertension, and smoking appeared stronger drivers of cardiovascular disease in women, whereas lipid metrics appeared stronger risk determinants for men. These findings highlight the importance of sex-specific preventive strategies and suggest priority targets for intervention in men and women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Remfry et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Incident myocardial infarction and stroke (n=363,313). Vascular risk factors vs. Men vs Women was evaluated on Incident myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke (RHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.27-1.66). Current smoking (RHR 1.45; 95% CI 1.27-1.66) and hypertension conferred a greater excess risk of myocardial infarction in women than men, whereas lipid metrics were stronger risk determinants for men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: