Key result
FVSI ≥0.45 predicts an ~8-fold higher risk of hospitalization, increased PH treatment, and death.
Why the study?
Elevated right atrial pressure predicts poor prognosis in pulmonary hypertension, but reliable non-invasive estimation techniques are lacking.
Does the femoral venous stasis index accurately estimate right atrial pressure and predict morbidity/mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Observational (n=101)
Does the femoral venous stasis index accurately estimate right atrial pressure and predict morbidity/mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The femoral venous stasis index is a simple, non-invasive tool that accurately estimates right atrial pressure and predicts morbidity and mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Background Elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) is associated with poor prognosis regarding 1-year mortality in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. Unfortunately, there is currently no reliable non-invasive technique for estimating RAP in PH patients. Recently, femoral venous stasis index (FVSI) has been described as highly correlated with RAP in PH patients. Our main goal was to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of FVSI for estimating RAP. Methods In this prospective study, we included 101 patients with suspected or known PH undergoing right heart catheterisation for 18 months. Results FVSI was highly correlated with RAP (r s =0.77, p<0.001). With a cut-off of 0.18, FVSI can exclude RAP >8 mmHg with 89% sensitivity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.88) and, with a cut-off of 0.45, can confirm RAP >14 mmHg with 93% specificity (AUROC 0.93). During a 2-year follow-up, the composite end-point (hospitalisation, increase in PH treatment and all-cause death) occurred in 32 patients (31.7%). FVSI predicted PH morbidity/mortality (FVSI ≥0.45 versus <0.18: HR 8.37 (95% CI 2.84–24.7); p<0.001). Inter-observer reproducibility between junior and senior operators was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98)). Conclusion We propose FVSI as a rapid, simple, non-invasive tool for estimating RAP and which may be of additional prognostic interest in terms of PH-related morbi-mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Croquette et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension (n=101). Femoral venous stasis index (FVSI) vs. FVSI <0.18 was evaluated on Composite of hospitalisation, increase in PH treatment and all-cause death (HR 8.37, 95% CI 2.84-24.7, p=<0.001). Femoral venous stasis index (FVSI) ≥0.45 versus <0.18 strongly predicted the composite of hospitalization, increased PH treatment, and all-cause death (HR 8.37; 95% CI 2.84–24.7; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: