Key result
Dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonism may be necessary to obtain maximal efficacy in chronic cardiovascular diseases due to the co-existence and cross-talk of ETA and ETB receptors.
Why the study?
Does dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonism provide better efficacy than selective ETA antagonism in chronic cardiovascular diseases?
Does dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonism provide better efficacy than selective ETA antagonism in chronic cardiovascular diseases?
Dual antagonism of both ETA and ETB receptors may offer superior therapeutic efficacy over selective ETA antagonism in chronic cardiovascular diseases due to receptor cross-talk and pathological receptor remodeling.
Dual ETA/ETB antagonism may be required for maximal efficacy; leaves open whether it outperforms selective ETA blockade in chronic cardiovascular diseases.
Endothelin has been described as the most potent vasoconstrictor known. Recent research shows that it is also a growth factor, a promoter of fibrosis and inflammation, and a key initiator of endothelial dysfunction. Endothelin becomes, therefore, a candidate in the pathogenesis of many chronic cardiovascular and fibrotic diseases, and inhibition of endothelin function is a potential therapeutic approach for those diseases. Endothelin receptor antagonists are now established therapy in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, and present promising perspectives in diabetic nephropathy, peripheral arterial disease, hypertension, heart failure, and pulmonary diseases. Endothelin binds to two endothelin receptors, ET A and ET B , and their respective roles are actively debated. A major challenge lies in the understanding of what is the preferred profile for new drugs: selective ET A antagonism or dual ET A and ET B receptor antagonism. A number of cardiovascular diseases are characterized by an up‐regulation of smooth muscle cell ET B receptors mediating vasoconstriction and proliferation, and a down‐regulation of endothelial ET B receptors, as compared to the physiological state, creating a situation where both ET A and ET B receptors contribute to vasoconstriction and remodeling. When these two receptor subtypes co‐exist, a cross‐talk between them, probably a result of receptor heterodimerization, suggests that dual ET A /ET B receptor antagonism may be necessary to obtain maximal efficacy. Drug Dev. Res. 67:825–834, 2006.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clozel et al. (2006) conducted a review in Chronic cardiovascular and fibrotic diseases. Dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonism was evaluated. Dual ETA/ETB receptor antagonism may be necessary to obtain maximal efficacy in chronic cardiovascular diseases due to the co-existence and cross-talk of ETA and ETB receptors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: