Key result
A subgroup with markedly increasing midlife systolic blood pressure (e.g., 3.1 mm Hg/year in men) had a greater risk of angina compared to the normative class (0.9 mm Hg/year).
Cohort (n=3,659)
Midlife blood pressure trajectories are heterogeneous, with a small subgroup experiencing marked increases that are associated with a higher risk of angina.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests midlife BP trajectory monitoring for angina risk stratification; leaves open whether modification alters outcomes.
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether there are subgroups with different underlying (latent) trajectories of midlife systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, and pulse pressure in a UK cohort. METHODS: Data are from 1840 men and 1819 women with BP measured at ages 36, 43, and 53 years. We used unconditional growth mixture models to test for the presence of latent trajectory classes. Extracted classes were described in terms of a number of known lifetime risk factors, and linked to the risk of undiagnosed angina (Rose questionnaire) at age 53 years. RESULTS: In both sexes for systolic BP, diastolic BP, and pulse pressure, there was a large "normative" class (>90% of the sample) characterized by gentle annual increases (eg, an increase in male systolic BP of 0.9 mm Hg/year [95% confidence interval = 0.9 to 1.0]), with a smaller class for whom the rate of increase was high (eg, an increase in male systolic BP of 3.1 mm Hg/year [2.8 to 3.4]). In women, there was an additional class for whom BP was high at age 36 and remained high. Persons in the "normative" classes were, on average, heavier at birth and taller at age 7 years, had a lower midlife body mass index, and were less likely to be on antihypertensive medication compared with those in other classes. Among those with no diagnosed cardiovascular disease, those in the classes with more strongly increasing systolic BP and pulse pressure were at greatest risk of angina. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that in midlife the majority of the population have a gentle underlying increase in BP, but that there also exists an important subgroup in whom BP increases much more markedly. These classes may be useful for identifying those most at risk for cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wills et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Midlife blood pressure trajectories (n=3,659). High rate of blood pressure increase vs. Normative gentle blood pressure increase was evaluated on Annual increase in male systolic BP (mm Hg/year) (95% CI 2.8-3.4). A subgroup with markedly increasing midlife systolic blood pressure (e.g., 3.1 mm Hg/year in men) had a greater risk of angina compared to the normative class (0.9 mm Hg/year).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: