Why the study?
The recurrent and silent nature of myocardial infarction requires continuous monitoring via wearable devices that must achieve adequate performance within power and memory constraints.
The proposed TMEX CNN architecture enables highly accurate and energy-efficient myocardial infarction detection suitable for resource-constrained wearable devices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enable accurate on-device MI detection in wearables; extends CNN models with gains in energy efficiency for constrained devices.
Myocardial Infarction (MI), also known as heart attack, is a life-threatening form of heart disease that is a leading cause of death worldwide. Its recurrent and silent nature emphasizes the need for continuous monitoring through wearable devices. The wearable device solutions should provide adequate performance while being resource-constrained in terms of power and memory. This paper proposes an MI detection methodology using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that outperforms the state-of-the-art works on wearable devices for two datasets - PTB and PTB-XL, while being energy and memory-efficient. Moreover, we also propose a novel Template Matching based Early Exit (TMEX) CNN architecture that further increases the energy efficiency compared to baseline architecture while maintaining similar performance. Our baseline and TMEX architecture achieve 99.33% and 99.24% accuracy on PTB dataset, whereas on PTB-XL dataset they achieve 84.36% and 84.24% accuracy, respectively. Both architectures are suitable for wearable devices requiring only 20 KB of RAM. Evaluation of real hardware shows that our baseline architecture is 0.6x to 53x more energy-efficient than the state-of-the-art works on wearable devices. Moreover, our TMEX architecture further improves the energy efficiency by 8.12% (PTB) and 6.36% (PTB-XL) while maintaining similar performance as the baseline architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rashid et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: