Key result
Echo and CMR are essential to differentiate physiological adaptations from pathology in the athlete's heart.
Why the study?
Physical activity contributes to cardiac morphological changes known as athlete's heart, which can be characterized using various cardiac imaging modalities.
What are the current status and future prospects of different cardiac imaging modalities in assessing athlete's heart?
What are the current status and future prospects of different cardiac imaging modalities in assessing athlete's heart?
This review highlights the respective advantages and limitations of multimodality imaging, emphasizing echocardiography as the first-line tool and CMR for complex differentiation in sports cardiology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Informs imaging selection in athletes; leaves open standardization of multimodality protocols.
BACKGROUND: Physical activity contributes to changes in cardiac morphology, which are known as "athlete's heart". Therefore, these modifications can be characterized using different imaging modalities such as echocardiography, including Doppler (flow Doppler and Doppler myocardial imaging) and speckle-tracking, along with cardiac magnetic resonance, and cardiac computed tomography. MAIN TEXT: Echocardiography is the most common method for assessing cardiac structure and function in athletes due to its availability, repeatability, versatility, and low cost. It allows the measurement of parameters like left ventricular wall thickness, cavity dimensions, and mass. Left ventricular myocardial strain can be measured by tissue Doppler (using the pulse wave Doppler principle) or speckle tracking echocardiography (using the two-dimensional grayscale B-mode images), which provide information on the deformation of the myocardium. Cardiac magnetic resonance provides a comprehensive evaluation of cardiac morphology and function with superior accuracy compared to echocardiography. With the addition of contrast agents, myocardial state can be characterized. Thus, it is particularly effective in differentiating an athlete's heart from pathological conditions, however, is less accessible and more expensive compared to other techniques. Coronary computed tomography is used to assess coronary artery anatomy and identify anomalies or diseases, but its use is limited due to radiation exposure and cost, making it less suitable for young athletes. A novel approach, hemodynamic forces analysis, uses feature tracking to quantify intraventricular pressure gradients responsible for blood flow. Hemodynamic forces analysis has the potential for studying blood flow within the heart and assessing cardiac function. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, each diagnostic technique has its own advantages and limitations for assessing cardiac adaptations in athletes. Examining and comparing the cardiac adaptations resulting from physical activity with the structural cardiac changes identified through different diagnostic modalities is a pivotal focus in the field of sports medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zholshybek et al. (2023) conducted a review in Athlete's heart. Cardiac imaging modalities (Echocardiography, CMR, CCT) was evaluated. Various cardiac imaging modalities, including echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance, are essential for characterizing the athlete's heart and differentiating physiological adaptations from pathological conditions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: