Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: A positive microscopic margin (PMM) is a significant prognostic variable and leads to local recurrence (LR) in high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. Its effect on the rate of distant metastasis (DM) and tumor mortality (TM) remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight primary, high-risk (high-grade, deep, > or = 5 cm) extremity STS patients were identified from our data base, of which 42 had a PMM. Limb-sparing surgery (LSS) was the primary surgical therapy in 144 patients; 24 received amputation (AMP). Statistical analysis was by log-rank test and Cox model. Significance was defined as a P value less than .05. RESULTS: A PMM was a significant negative prognostic factor for both DM and TM (P = .002 and .002, respectively). However, those patients who received LSS with 28% PMMs showed no significant difference in the rate of DM or TM compared with patients who received AMP with only 8% PMMs (log-rank, P = .057 and .28, respectively). A PMM was significantly associated with > or = 1,000 mL blood loss and more than 3 hours of operating time (P < .006 and .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The strong statistical significance that relates a PMM to DM and TM in high-risk STS of the extremity is likely related to biologically aggressive tumors and LSS. Residual microscopic disease is not a guarantee of LR. The main problem in this group of patients is not LR, but DM and subsequent death. Therefore, to increase a disability with further surgery or amputate a patient's limb without clear evidence of LR in this group at high risk for distant recurrence is not recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heslin et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: