Key result
CACNA1B missense mutation links familial myoclonus-dystonia-like syndrome and cardiac arrhythmias to reduced CaV2.2 channel current.
Observational
A novel CACNA1B mutation (R1389H) alters CaV2.2 channel function, potentially causing a unique myoclonus-dystonia-like syndrome associated with cardiac arrhythmias.
May link CACNA1B variants to combined dystonia-arrhythmia phenotypes; leaves open validation and prevalence studies.
Using exome sequencing and linkage analysis in a three-generation family with a unique dominant myoclonus-dystonia-like syndrome with cardiac arrhythmias, we identified a mutation in the CACNA1B gene, coding for neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels CaV2.2. This mutation (c.4166G>A;p.Arg1389His) is a disruptive missense mutation in the outer region of the ion pore. The functional consequences of the identified mutation were studied using whole-cell and single-channel patch recordings. High-resolution analyses at the single-channel level showed that, when open, R1389H CaV2.2 channels carried less current compared with WT channels. Other biophysical channel properties were unaltered in R1389H channels including ion selectivity, voltage-dependent activation or voltage-dependent inactivation. CaV2.2 channels regulate transmitter release at inhibitory and excitatory synapses. Functional changes could be consistent with a gain-of-function causing the observed hyperexcitability characteristic of this unique myoclonus-dystonia-like syndrome associated with cardiac arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Groen et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Myoclonus-dystonia-like syndrome with cardiac arrhythmias. CACNA1B mutation (c.4166G>A;p.Arg1389His) vs. Wild-type channels was evaluated on Functional consequences of the identified mutation on CaV2.2 channels. A missense mutation (c.4166G>A;p.Arg1389His) in the CACNA1B gene was identified in a family with myoclonus-dystonia-like syndrome and cardiac arrhythmias, causing reduced CaV2.2 channel current.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: