Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Breakthrough curves, cycle mass balances, and cycle bed productivities (mg H2 per gram of adsorbent) on three dual adsorbent amounts (g) of 2,892, 1,963, and 1,013 respectively each filling 200 cm, 135 cm, and 70 cm of a 5.0 cm internal diameter stainless steel pipe were performed. The approximate optimum (sludge pyrolysis) synthesis gas with composition in volume % of 45% H2/35% CO/20% CH4 was used as the feed gas with molecular sieve 5 Å and activated carbon as adsorbents. Impurity breakthroughs occurred at ∼14.9, 12.3, and 5.0 minutes respectively for % cycle recoveries of 72.2, 65.0, and 60.2 using 2,892, 1,962, and 1,013 g of adsorbent respectively. Our results indicated that basing % recycle recovery on cycle bed productivity can enable efficient hydrogen recovery with savings on adsorbent amount. An optimum cycle bed productivity of 2.3 mg H2/g of adsorbent corresponded to a cycle recovery of 66.2% for 2,300 g of adsorbent used. Only 1.7 mg H2/g of adsorbent was obtained for a cycle recovery of 72.2% requiring up to 2,800 g of adsorbent. This makes economic sense in the pressure swing adsorption separation of hydrogen from traditionally low hydrogen concentration biomass sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teiseh et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: