Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I consider the problem of testing that two populations are identical with respect to the distribution of a continuous variable against the alternative that values tend to be larger in one population. I observe that the t, rank-sum, and log-rank tests are insensitive for a large class of alternatives that may be expected to occur commonly in practice, propose a criterion for identifying this problem in a particular data set, and propose corresponding extensions of the conventional methods. The proposed methods should be useful for both identifying and interpreting group differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter C. O’Brien (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: