Key result
Quantitative stress-echocardiography ejection fractions correlated well with radionuclide angiography (r = 0.81, P < 0.01), demonstrating its feasibility in chronic regurgitant valvular lesions.
Why the study?
Does quantitative stress-echocardiography reliably measure stress-dependent left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to radionuclide angiography in patients with chronic aortic and mitral regurgitation?
Observational (n=32)
Does quantitative stress-echocardiography reliably measure stress-dependent left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to radionuclide angiography in patients with chronic aortic and mitral regurgitation?
Quantitative stress-echocardiography is a feasible and reliable alternative to radionuclide angiography for evaluating stress-dependent left ventricular function in patients with chronic regurgitant valvular lesions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stress-echocardiography may support noninvasive EF assessment in chronic regurgitation; leaves open prospective outcome validation before adoption.
It was the purpose of the present study to prove the feasibility and reliability of quantitative stress-echocardiography as an alternative method to radionuclide angiography (RNA) in chronic regurgitant valvular lesions. Echocardiography and RNA are most commonly used to obtain various left ventricular (LV) morphometric and functional parameters that have been postulated to predict long-term prognosis in patients with aortic and mitral valvular regurgitation. Supine bicycle ergometry with a workload ranging from 25-250 Watts was used to evaluate stress dependent LV volumes and ejection fractions (EFs) in patients with pure aortic (n = 18) and mitral regurgitation (n = 14). Most patients (23/32) underwent simultaneous right heart catheterization. Echocardiographic EFs were validated by RNA with good correlations (r = 0.81, P < 0.01). Patients with aortic regurgitation and functional class I/II (9), had a significant increase in EF during exercise (60%-67%, P < 0.001) and a reduction in end-systolic volume (71-52 mL, P < 0.01). In comparison, patients with class III symptoms (9), had a drop in EF (53%-49%, P < 0.01), had larger baseline end-systolic volume (104 mL, P = NS), which did not decrease during stress (104 vs 107 mL, P = NS). In patients with chronic mitral regurgitation baseline and exercise EF did not differ between class I/II (6) and class III (8), however, mildly symptomatic patients increased from 57%-67%, (P < 0.01) versus patients in class III (65% vs 69%, P = NS). Stroke volume index was not different at baseline (44 vs 33 mL/m(2), P = NS); however, there were significant differences during exercise (70 vs 41 mL/m(2), P = 0.05). Quantitative stress-echocardiography is a noninvasive and safe alternative method to RNA, which allows reliable calculation of stress dependent LV volumes and EF. Determination of end-systolic volumes may be of additional prognostic value. The combination of a high baseline EF and low stroke volume index with the inability to improve during exercise might reflect early stages of impaired LV function in patients with severe mitral regurgitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klues et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Chronic aortic and mitral regurgitation (n=32). Quantitative stress-echocardiography vs. Radionuclide angiography (RNA) was evaluated on Correlation of echocardiographic ejection fractions with radionuclide angiography (r = 0.81, p=< 0.01). Quantitative stress-echocardiography ejection fractions correlated well with radionuclide angiography (r = 0.81, P < 0.01), demonstrating its feasibility in chronic regurgitant valvular lesions.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: