Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The DestinyBreast-(DB)-04 and DB06-trials have shown clinical activity of Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2-low and HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer (BC). The identification of HER2-low and -ultralow BC is therefore essential for personalized therapy with T-DXd. We evaluated 723 residual tumors from the PENELOPE-B trial (NCT01864746) and correlated different levels of HER2 protein expression with prognosis and mRNA profiles, including HER2 transcripts. In PENELOPE-B, 57.68% (n=417) of 723 residual tumors were HER2-low. The HER2-ultralow category was assigned to 109 tumors (15.08%), and 197 tumors (27.25%) were completely HER2 negative (HER2-zero). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no survival differences among these three subgroups. There was no significant difference in HER2 mRNA expression between HER2-zero and HER2-ultralow tumors (p=0.08). In contrast, there was a highly significant difference in HER2 mRNA expression between HER2-ultralow and HER2-low tumors (p<0.0001) and between HER2-low and HER2-positive tumors (p<0.0001). The extracellular protease Cathepsin-L, which has been suggested as a biomarker for extracellular cleavage of T-DXd, was detectable in all HER2-related subgroups, and was a negative prognostic factor for iDFS and OS (p=0.0001) in pre-neoadjuvant core biopsies. In our study, we were able to characterize HER2-low as a clinically relevant and molecular defined tumor group with significantly increased HER2-expression. In contrast, for HER2-ultralow we did not observe a defined molecular phenotype, despite the clinically relevant regulatory approval of T-DXd also in the ultra-low subgroup. Additional investigations are needed to identify biomarkers beyond HER2 for T-DXd response as a basis for refined criteria for treatment eligibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denkert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: