Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There are several theories of the pathogenesis of urate 2 accumulation in patients with gout. A disturbance of elimination of this substance by the kidneys is probably the most popular. This has been challenged, however, in a previous communication from this laboratory (1), since it appears to be inconsistent with certain experimental data. Whether or not this theory is valid, it deserves serious consideration because urates as naturally occurring end-products of purine metabolism are disposed of by the body largely by excretion through the kidneys. If one pursues the hypothesis to a logical conclusion, any defect of elimination might be inherited or it might be an acquired phenomenon following damage to the functioning units of the kidneys. The accepted theory (2, 3) of renal physiology in man assumes that urates are present in glomerular urine as are other ultrafiltrable substances and reabsorbed in part by the cells lining the tubules. If the kidneys were primarily at fault in the gouty diathesis, accumulation of urate might be attributed either to (a) a reduction of the number of functioning glomeruli or (b) an increased reabsorption by the tubules. Both of these phenomena are partially susceptible of quantitative analysis now that improved methods for the study of kidney function are available. A presentation and discussion of kidney function data, as determined by five experimental procedures, are contained in this communication. These include tests for the excretion of substances normally present in the body such as urea, creatinine, urate, sodium and chloride and for the excretion of foreign substances introduced parenterally such as phenolsulphonphthalein, neo-iopax
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coombs et al. (1940) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: