Key result
Baseline P2Y12 inhibitors do not modify aspirin dose efficacy but associate with ~40% higher ischemic risk.
Why the study?
Whether concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor therapy modifies the effect of aspirin dose on clinical events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains unclear.
Does high-dose aspirin compared to low-dose aspirin reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and is this effect modified by concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor use?
RCT (n=13,815)
Does high-dose aspirin compared to low-dose aspirin reduce the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and is this effect modified by concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor use?
Effect estimate: adjusted HR 1.40 (95% CI 1.22-1.62)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.86% vs 6.31%
In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin is not modified by concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor therapy.
Aspirin dosing for secondary prevention need not account for P2Y12 inhibitor use; confirms absence of interaction in this RCT.
Background The ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness) was a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial that found no difference between high- versus low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Whether concomitant P2Y12 inhibitor therapy modifies the effect of aspirin dose on clinical events remains unclear. Methods and Results Participants in ADAPTABLE were stratified according to baseline use of clopidogrel or prasugrel (P2Y12 group). The primary effectiveness end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and the primary safety end point was major bleeding requiring blood transfusions. We used multivariable Cox regression to compare the relative effectiveness and safety of aspirin dose within P2Y12 and non-P2Y12 groups. Of 13 815 (91.6%) participants with available data, 3051 (22.1%) were receiving clopidogrel (2849 [93.4%]) or prasugrel (203 [6.7%]) at baseline. P2Y12 inhibitor use was associated with higher risk of the primary effectiveness end point (10.86% versus 6.31%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% CI, 1.22-1.62]) but was not associated with bleeding (0.95% versus 0.53%; adjusted HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.91-2.22]). We found no interaction in the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Overall, dose switching or discontinuation was more common in the high-dose compared with low-dose aspirin group, but the pattern was not modified by P2Y12 inhibitor use. Conclusions In this prespecified analysis of ADAPTABLE, we found that the relative effectiveness and safety of high- versus low-dose aspirin was not modified by baseline P2Y12 inhibitor use. Registration https://www.clinical.trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02697916.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girotra et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (n=13,815). High-dose aspirin vs. Low-dose aspirin was evaluated on composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (adjusted HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.22-1.62). High- versus low-dose aspirin effectiveness and safety for secondary prevention were not modified by baseline P2Y12 inhibitor use, which independently increased ischemic risk (HR 1.40; 95% CI 1.22-1.62).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: