Key result
Plasma DHA and non-DHA n3 accurately estimate the Omega-3 Index at ~6% in the UK Biobank.
Why the study?
Information on the Omega-3 Index in the UK is scarce, prompting the development of an equation to estimate it from UK Biobank NMR plasma fatty acid data.
Cross-Sectional (n=117,108)
Yes
Effect estimate: r = 0.832
p-value: p=<0.0001
An equation was developed to estimate the Omega-3 Index from NMR data in the UK Biobank, revealing a mean eO3I of 5.58% and identifying fish intake and supplementation as primary predictors.
May enable large-scale Omega-3 Index estimation from NMR data; leaves open prognostic value and supplementation effects.
Information on the Omega-3 Index (O3I) in the United Kingdom (UK) is scarce. The UK-Biobank (UKBB) contains data on total plasma n 3-PUFA% and DHA% measured by NMR. The aim of our study was to create an equation to estimate the O3I (eO3I) from these data. We first performed an inter-laboratory experiment with 250 random blood samples in which the O3I was measured in erythrocytes by GC, and total n 3 % and DHA% were measured in plasma by NMR. The best predictor of eO3I included both DHA% and a derived metric, the total n 3 %–DHA%. Together these explained 65 % of the variability ( r = 0·832, P < 0·0001). We then estimated the O3I in 117 108 UKBB subjects and correlated it with demographic and lifestyle variables in multivariable-adjusted models. The mean eO3I was 5·58 % ( sd 2·35 %) in this UKBB cohort. Several predictors were significantly correlated with eO3I (all P < 0·0001). In general order of impact and with directionality (–, inverse and +, direct): oily-fish consumption (+), fish oil supplement use (+), female sex (+), older age (+), alcohol use (+), smoking (–), higher waist circumference and BMI (–), lower socioeconomic status and less education (–). Only 20·5 % of eO3I variability could be explained by predictors investigated, and oily fish consumption accounted for 7·0 % of that. With the availability of the eO3I in the UKBB cohort, we will be in a position to link risk for a variety of diseases with this commonly used and well-documented marker of n 3-PUFA biostatus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuchardt et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in General population (n=117,108). Predictors of Omega-3 Index (e.g., oily fish consumption, fish oil supplements) was evaluated on Correlation between estimated Omega-3 Index (eO3I) and actual O3I (r = 0.832, p=<0.0001). An equation using plasma DHA% and non-DHA n3% accurately estimated the Omega-3 Index (r = 0.832), revealing a mean estimated Omega-3 Index of 5.58% in the UK Biobank cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: