⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

December 1, 1990CirculationOpen Access

Sotalol versus quinidine for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after direct current conversion of atrial fibrillation.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Authors

SJSteen Juul‐MöllerLund University NENils EdvardssonElectrophysiology NRN Rehnqvist-AhlbergMalmö University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May inform antiarrhythmic choice after cardioversion; leaves open need for safety data versus modern agents.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Juul‐Möller et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d28fdd7cdc72b86656667 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.82.6.1932

Topics

Atrial fibrillation Persistent AF management Anticoagulation in AF

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Controlled trial of a long-acting quinidine for maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of sustained atrial fibrillation1981 · 67 citations
2Maintenance of sinus rhythm after atrial defibrillation.1970 · 74 citations
3FACTORS INFLUENCING PERSISTENCE OF SINUS RHYTHM AFTER DC SHOCK TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION1971 · 79 citations
4Electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects of sotalol in patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.1985 · 155 citations
5A comparison of digoxin, diltiazem and their combination in the treatment of atrial fibrillation1988 · 56 citations