Why the study?
Does oral flecainide acetate compare to intravenous flecainide acetate in acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in patients with recent onset or chronic atrial fibrillation?
Population
40 patients with atrial fibrillation, classified into recent onset and chronic
Comparison
Oral flecainide acetate (up to 400 mg in 3 h) vs Intravenous flecainide acetate
Design
RCT, Randomly assigned
Follow-up
Up to 5 hours
Authors
Loading...
Supports flecainide (oral or IV) for acute conversion in recent-onset AF but not chronic; confirms duration-dependent efficacy.
Does oral flecainide acetate compare to intravenous flecainide acetate in acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in patients with recent onset or chronic atrial fibrillation?
Both oral and intravenous flecainide are highly effective and safe for acute conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation, but are ineffective for chronic atrial fibrillation.
Crijns et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: