Key result
Normalized compressed distance outperforms normalized FFT for classifying simulated spiral wave behaviors during AF.
Why the study?
Does normalized compression distance (NCD) improve the classification of spiral wave behaviors compared to normalized FFT in simulated atrial fibrillation models?
Does normalized compression distance (NCD) improve the classification of spiral wave behaviors compared to normalized FFT in simulated atrial fibrillation models?
Normalized compression distance outperforms normalized FFT in classifying simulated spiral wave behaviors, offering a potential computational approach to characterize atrial fibrillation mechanisms from catheter recordings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports NCD for simulated AF spiral waves; leaves open translation to clinical catheter recordings.
Analysis of electrical activation patterns such as re-entries during atrial fibrillation (Afib) is crucial in understanding arrhythmic mechanisms and assessment of diagnostic measures. Spiral waves are a phenomena that provide intuitive basis for re-entries occurring in cardiac tissue. Distinct spiral wave behaviors such as stable spiral waves, meandering spiral waves, and spiral wave break-up may have distinct electrogram manifestations on a mapping catheter. Hence, it is desirable to have an automated classification of spiral wave behavior based on catheter recordings for a qualitative characterization of spatiotemporal electrophysiological activity on atrial tissue. In this study, we propose a method for classification of spatiotemporal characteristics of simulated atrial activation patterns in terms of distinct spiral wave behaviors during Afib using two different techniques: normalized compressed distance (NCD) and normalized FFT (NFFTD). We use a phenomenological model for cardiac electrical propagation to produce various simulated spiral wave behaviors on a 2D grid and labeled them as stable, meandering, or breakup. By mimicking commonly used catheter types, a star shaped and a circular shaped both of which do the local readings from atrial wall, monopolar and bipolar intracardiac electrograms are simulated. Virtual catheters are positioned at different locations on the grid. The classification performance for different catheter locations, types and for monopolar or bipolar readings were also compared. We observed that the performance for each case differed slightly. However, we found that NCD performance is superior to NFFTD. Through the simulation study, we showed the theoretical validation of the proposed method. Our findings suggest that a qualitative wavefront activation pattern can be assessed during Afib without the need for highly invasive mapping techniques such as multisite simultaneous electrogram recordings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alagöz et al. (2015) studied Atrial fibrillation. Normalized compressed distance (NCD) vs. Normalized FFT (NFFTD) was evaluated on Classification performance of spiral wave behavior. Normalized compressed distance (NCD) yielded superior classification performance compared to normalized FFT for identifying simulated spiral wave behaviors during atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: