Key result
Left-to-right systolic ventricular pressure transmission is ~4.6-fold greater than right-to-left transmission.
Why the study?
The systolic coupling between the ventricles and the relative importance of ventricular interaction in the pressure development of each ventricle needed to be measured and determined.
Does left-to-right systolic ventricular interaction contribute more to right ventricular pressure development than right-to-left interaction contributes to left ventricular pressure development in anesthetized dogs?
Does left-to-right systolic ventricular interaction contribute more to right ventricular pressure development than right-to-left interaction contributes to left ventricular pressure development in anesthetized dogs?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systolic ventricular interaction is a major determinant of right ventricular systolic pressure generation (contributing ~20-40%), meaning standard right ventricular systolic function parameters are substantially influenced by the left ventricle.
Study objective The aim was to measure the systolic coupling between the ventricles and to determine the relative importance of ventricular interaction in the pressure development of each ventricle. Design Acute studies were done in dogs to measure the changes in right and left ventricular pressures (dPr, dPl) caused by sudden changes in left ventricular pressure (dPl') with release of an aortic constriction, and sudden changes in right ventricular pressure (dPr') with release of a pulmonary artery constriction, respectively. The instantaneous cross talk gain [dPr/dPl' (Klr) or dPl/dPr' (Krl)] was calculated during the ejection phase. The potential systolic pressure generated by the contralateral ventricle was evaluated as the cross talk gain multiplied by the contralateral systolic developed pressure. Experimental material Studies were done in eight random source dogs (12-18 kg), anaesthetised with sodium pentobarbitone. Measurements and main results The maximal Klr was lower than the maximal Krl, at 0.09 (SD 0.05) v 0.25 (0.06), and the mean Klr also was lower than the mean Krl, at 0.04 (0.02) v 0.10 (0.03), p less than 0.05. The potential right ventricular pressures developed by the left ventricle [maximum 10.3(5.6), mean 4.8(2.7) mm Hg] were not significantly different from the potential left ventricular pressures developed by the right ventricle [maximum 8.8(2.7), mean 3.4(0.7) mm Hg]. However, the ratio between the potential transmitted pressure and the measured developed pressure was greater in the right ventricle [maximum 39.0(21.1), mean 17.8(8.9)%] than in the left ventricle [maximum 11.1(7.1)%, p less than 0.05; mean 3.9(1.5)%, p less than 0.01]. This suggests that about 20-40% of the right ventricular systolic pressure may result from the left ventricle and about 4-10% of the left ventricular systolic pressure may result from right ventricle. Conclusions Although the pressure coupling was greater in right to left ventricular interaction, right ventricular pressure generation may be more dependent on the left ventricle. Systolic ventricular interaction may be more important for right ventricular systolic function. Further, the parameters of right ventricular systolic function currently used may be considerably affected by the left ventricle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (1991) studied Systolic ventricular interaction in anesthetized dogs (n=8). Sudden changes in left ventricular pressure via release of aortic constriction vs. Sudden changes in right ventricular pressure via release of pulmonary artery constriction was evaluated on Ratio between potential transmitted pressure and measured developed pressure in the right versus left ventricle (p=<0.01). Left-to-right systolic ventricular pressure transmission accounted for a mean 17.8% of right ventricular pressure vs 3.9% for right-to-left (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: