Key result
Medical treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions resulted in a higher 5-year rate of death, AMI, or CABG compared to surgical treatment (34% vs 16%, p=0.03).
Why the study?
Does medical treatment compared to surgical treatment (CABG) improve outcomes in patients with chronic total coronary occlusions?
Cohort (n=154)
No
Does medical treatment compared to surgical treatment (CABG) improve outcomes in patients with chronic total coronary occlusions?
Absolute Event Rate: 34% vs 16%
p-value: p=0.03
In patients with chronic total coronary occlusions, surgical treatment (CABG) may provide better long-term clinical outcomes than medical therapy, even in those with mild or absent anginal symptoms.
CABG was associated with fewer events than medical therapy in CTO; leaves open whether revascularization improves outcomes in randomized settings.
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an established treatment of patients with angina pectoris and chronic total coronary occlusion of major coronary arteries. However, in patients with mild or absent angina and chronic total coronary occlusion, optimal treatment is unsettled. We compared the prognosis of patients with chronic total coronary occlusion treated medically because of mild or absent angina with a matched group of patients undergoing CABG. In a retrospective design we evaluated all coronary angiographies performed in our department over a 5-year period. We identified 77 patients with chronic total occlusion of major coronary arteries eligible for CABG but treated medically because of mild or absent angina. The medically treated patients were matched on age, sex and ejection fraction with 77 patients with occluded major coronary arteries and angina pectoris who were treated surgically. The main outcome measures were death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and CABG. At baseline, CABG patients demonstrated an increased duration and severity of angina pectoris and an increased consumption of anti-anginal drugs. No differences were found with regard to angiographic parameters. The 5-year event rates (medically treated versus CABG) were: death, 14% vs 7% (p = 0.08); death or AMI; 27% vs 16% (p = 0.10); death, AMI or CABG, 34% vs 16% (p = 0.03) (log-rank statistics). In conclusion, our data indicate that patients with chronic total coronary occlusions and mild or absent anginal symptoms may benefit from surgical treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiggers et al. (1997) conducted a cohort in Chronic total occlusion of major coronary arteries (n=154). Medical treatment vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was evaluated on Death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or CABG (p=0.03). Medical treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions resulted in a higher 5-year rate of death, AMI, or CABG compared to surgical treatment (34% vs 16%, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: