Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Authors of medical publications rarely provide their readers with the full raw data from their work but provide only the summarised statistical analysis. Indeed, publishing the raw data in a paper journal would usually be impractical and of little help to readers as transcription from the printed paper to a computer for further analysis would be laborious and prone to transcription errors. Without raw data, however, peer reviewers are unable to check the statistical analysis, and further work on the data by others is not possible. I demonstrate a method of including the raw data within a web version of an audit project that includes real time data …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David J R Hutchon (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: