Key result
Group 1 and 4 PH are linked to elevated serum suPAR levels vs healthy controls.
Why the study?
Pulmonary hypertension is driven partly by chronic inflammation, but whether the immune activation marker suPAR is altered in Group 1 and Group 4 pulmonary hypertension and associates with clinical parameters remained unknown.
Are serum suPAR levels elevated in patients with Group 1 and Group 4 pulmonary hypertension compared to healthy controls, and do they correlate with disease severity?
Observational (n=89)
Are serum suPAR levels elevated in patients with Group 1 and Group 4 pulmonary hypertension compared to healthy controls, and do they correlate with disease severity?
Absolute Event Rate: 73.14% vs 65.52%
p-value: p=0.012
Serum suPAR is elevated in Group 1 and Group 4 pulmonary hypertension and correlates with functional and echocardiographic indices of disease severity, suggesting a potential role as a biomarker.
Elevated suPAR supports biomarker research in Group 1/4 PH; should not yet change practice pending prospective validation.
Background/Objectives: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disorder with high morbidity and mortality, partly driven by chronic inflammation. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) reflects immune activation. We evaluated whether suPAR is altered in Group 1 and Group 4 PH and its association with clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters. Methods: We enrolled 44 PH patients (36 in Group 1, 8 in Group 4) and 45 healthy controls. All underwent clinical and echocardiographic assessments; right heart catheterization was performed in the PH patients. Serum suPAR was measured by ELISA. N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were also assessed. Results: The suPAR plasma levels in the PH group were between 23.91 and 960.8 pg/mL (median: 73.14 p25: 62.77, p75: 167.13). suPAR was significantly higher in PH versus controls (73.14 [62.77–167.13] vs. 65.52 [53.06–80.91] pg/mL; p = 0.012). In logistic regression, systolic blood pressure, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NT-proBNP, and suPAR independently predicted PH. suPAR correlated negatively with six-minute walk distance (r = −0.310) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (r = −0.295) but positively with systolic pulmonary artery pressure (r = 0.241). On multivariate analysis, six-minute walk distance was the only independent correlate of suPAR (p = 0.004). suPAR levels did not differ between Group 1 and Group 4 PH. Conclusions: suPAR is elevated in Group 1 and Group 4 PH and correlates with functional and echocardiographic indices of disease severity. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine suPAR’s role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tunçez et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Group 1 and Group 4 Pulmonary Hypertension (n=89). Serum suPAR level assessment vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Serum suPAR levels (p=0.012). Serum suPAR levels were significantly elevated in patients with Group 1 and Group 4 pulmonary hypertension compared to healthy controls (median 73.14 vs 65.52 pg/mL; p=0.012).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: