Why the study?
Patients with diabetes mellitus remain at high risk of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stents, but the temporal progression and predictors of severe in-stent restenosis in this population are not well defined.
Severe in-stent restenosis occurs early (median 7 months) in diabetic patients after everolimus-eluting stenting, driven by metabolic dysregulation, thrombotic activity, and procedural complexity, which can be predicted using a novel risk-stratification model.
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in drug-eluting stents (DES), patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remain at 1.5-2 times higher risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) than non-diabetics. However, the temporal progression and predictors of severe ISR in this population are not well defined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 323 diabetic patients who underwent follow-up angiography after everolimus-eluting coronary stenting at a single center between May 2017 to December 2024. The primary outcome was the time to severe ISR (defined as ≥ 70% luminal narrowing). Demographic, clinical, metabolic (including METS-IR), and procedural (Gensini score, lesion characteristics) variables were analyzed. Cox regression identified predictors of accelerated restenosis, and a risk-stratification model was developed and validated internally. RESULTS: The median time to severe ISR was 7 months. Independent predictors included elevated D-dimer (HR = 1.001, p = 0.0004), BNP (HR = 1.001, p = 0.0001), METS-IR (HR = 1.378, p = 0.012), Gensini score (HR = 1.004, p = 0.032), and bilateral lesions (HR = 1.242, p = 0.03). Older age was identified as a protective factor, as was higher hemoglobin too. The risk model showed moderate discrimination (AUC = 0.702; sensitivity 68%; specificity 67%) and clinical utility on decision-curve analysis. CONCLUSION: Severe ISR manifests early in diabetics, driven by metabolic dysregulation, thrombotic activity, and procedural complexity. The validated risk-stratification model facilitates personalized surveillance and targeted interventions to mitigate the ISR burden on this vulnerable population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lessomo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: