Identifies screening standards for science and technology workers, highlighting the need for accurate statistics.
Defining science and technology workers scientifically is a fundamental issue in building a strong nation in science and technology. Based on authoritative sources such as the *Classification of Occupations of the People's Republic of China (2022 Edition)*, this study employs a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to identify a professional system of science and technology workers covering 771 occupational subcategories, and constructs screening criteria based on education level and age. Furthermore, addressing limitations such as data timeliness, part-time identification, and updates to emerging occupations, this study proposes suggestions including improving multi-source data fusion statistics, strengthening the inclusion of grassroots talent, and establishing a dynamic updating mechanism, providing theoretical basis and practical pathways for accurate statistics on science and technology workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: