Investigates slope structure evolution influencing spatial competition among land uses in China, suggesting new management strategies.
Rapid urbanization and stringent ecological protection policies in China have reshaped spatial competition among urban, agricultural, and ecological spaces. However, existing studies often overlook how this competition evolves across different slope structures. To address this, this study establishes a fine-scale analytical framework using H3 hexagonal grids and slope spectrum analysis to investigate slope structure evolution and spatial competition patterns from 1990 to 2023. The results reveal a distinct topographic stratification: urban space dominates low-slope regions (<6°) but exhibits a pervasive “upslope expansion” trend, with its average slope increasing from 1.81° to 2.07°, equivalent to an annualized increase of approximately 0.008°yr−1; agricultural space characterizes the transition zones (6–15°), showing an “upslope migration” in the Southeastern Hills associated with urban expansion pressure in low-slope areas; and ecological space functions as a stable barrier in steep terrains (>15°) but faces encroachment in transition zones. Furthermore, cluster analysis identifies significant regional heterogeneity aligned with China’s macro-topography, including “low-slope agglomeration” in the Eastern Plains, “interwoven upslope” patterns in the Southern Hilly Regions, and ecological dominance in the Western Highlands. Association analysis using GeoDetector and Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) indicates that competition intensity is most strongly associated with human activity factors, especially human footprint and nighttime lights (q>0.29), which show the highest explanatory power among the examined factor groups. The interaction between human activity and elevation further shows relatively high explanatory power (q=0.41), suggesting that spatial competition is more pronounced where intensive human activities overlap with topographic constraints. Crucially, this study challenges the traditional flat-projection planning model. We propose a transition to “three-dimensional topographic regulation,” advocating differentiated management strategies—such as strict “slope redlines” for urban-agricultural transition zones—to mitigate intensifying spatial conflicts in complex terrains and safeguard agricultural sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: