PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Acta horticulturae et regiotecturae0 citationsOpen Access

Arboreta as Cultural Landscapes: Comparative Analysis of International Case Studies. Towards Guidelines for the Design of New Arboreta

MRMaria RudkaCTCatarina Patoilo Teixeira

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate spatial and organizational patterns of internationally recognized arboreta to inform their design.
  • Comparative case-study approach using ten internationally acknowledged arboreta.
  • Analysis structured around general characterization, spatial and vegetation organization, accessibility, and botanical collection organization.
  • All arboreta georeferenced and vectorized for standardized comparison.
  • Consistent spatial and organizational tendencies were identified across case studies.
  • Design recommendations were formulated based on shared variables.
  • Findings help improve the planning and design of new arboreta.

Abstract

Abstract Arboreta are designed and specialised green spaces that assemble organised living collections of tree and shrub species, dedicated to the conservation of biodiversity, research, education, and public engagement. Despite their recognised importance, the spatial and functional organisation of arboreta remains comparatively underexplored in the literature. This study addresses this gap by analysing how spatial structure supports their multifunctional roles. The main research question is: which spatial and organisational patterns characterise internationally recognised arboreta, and how can these inform the design of new ones? The study formulates design-oriented recommendations for arboreta, based on a comparative spatial analysis of ten internationally recognised reference cases. The selected arboreta were identified through their frequency of citation in the literature, ArbNet Level IV accreditation, and founding date listed by BGCI. The methodology follows a comparative case-study approach structured around four analytical axes: general characterisation, spatial and vegetation organisation, accessibility and services, and botanical collection organisation. All arboreta were georeferenced and vectorised within a standardised framework, producing comparable maps and tables that supported the analysis of shared variables. The results reveal consistent spatial and organisational tendencies across cases, alongside contextual specificities. Based on these findings, design recommendations were formulated, providing general guidelines applicable to the planning and design of new arboreta.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rudka et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f62f03e14405aa9aae7https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2026-0010
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mapping arboretum research: Trends, gaps, and opportunities for biodiversity conservation, society, and climate resilience2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Celebrating botanic gardens2023 · 3 citations
  3. 3Conserving Biodiversity through Ecological Restoration: The Potential Contributions of Botanical Gardens and Arboreta2016 · 35 citations
  4. 4Intersecting urban forestry and botanical gardens to address big challenges for healthier trees, people, and cities2019 · 71 citations
  5. 5Plant conservation in the Anthropocene – Challenges and future prospects2017 · 133 citations