Retrospective cohort study investigates factors linked to non-diagnostic cytology in EBUS-TBNA, suggesting larger lymph nodes improve diagnostics.
Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is widely used for diagnosing pulmonary diseases causing mediastinal lymphadenopathy. However, non-diagnostic results may occur. This study investigated factors associated with non-diagnostic cytological results in EBUS-TBNA. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA at a tertiary hospital between March 2019 and December 2023. Data on demographics, biopsy techniques, cyto-/histopathological results, sonographic lymph node measurements, and pre-procedural PET-CT SUVmax values were recorded. Cytological results were classified as diagnostic or non-diagnostic. We analyzed the characteristics and associated factors of patients who were non-diagnostically identified. Results: Among 776 patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA, 502 (64.7%) were male, with a mean age of 61.5 ± 12.6 years. A total of 1110 lymph nodes were sampled. Of the patients, 14.1% had a non-diagnostic cytology. Among the diagnosed patients, cytological findings showed 58.9% non-malignant, 41.1% malignant. The most sampled station was station 7 (72.9%), with an average of 5.9 ± 1.4 aspirations. Diagnostic cases had significantly more aspirations (p = 0.022) and sampled larger lymph node sizes (p < 0.001). Each 1 mm increase in lymph node size raised the likelihood of diagnostic results by 1.04 times (adjOR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02–1.08, p = 0.002). The largest lymph node size significantly predicted diagnostic results (AUROC = 0.611, p < 0.001). A cut-off of 19.55 mm had 67.0% sensitivity and 52.2% specificity. Conclusion: Sampled larger lymph nodes increase diagnostic yield in EBUS-TBNA, reducing the need for repeat procedures and enabling earlier treatment, thereby decreasing morbidity and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sertçelik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: