PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 20, 2026Public Administration and Development0 citations

Education Aid Coordination in Post‐Coup Myanmar

View Full Paper
KHKhaing Phyu HtutHGHalász GáborCLChristopher Lawson

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess education aid coordination in Myanmar following the 2021 military coup and identify effective strategies amidst instability.
  • Synthesis of field-level evidence from 2021 to 2025.
  • Analysis of the roles of international donors, UN agencies, civil society, and ethnic education systems.
  • Evaluation of mechanisms like the Joint Response Framework to enhance adaptive coordination.
  • Identified challenges included fragmented governance and data inconsistency affecting coordination.
  • Successful strategies involved structured pluralism and harmonized monitoring systems that improved engagement with global education funds.
  • Insights from Myanmar provide practical lessons for strengthening aid coordination in similar fragile contexts.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fragile and conflict‐affected situations (FCAS) pose challenges for public administration and continuity of education services, particularly when state legitimacy is eroded or absent. Myanmar's education landscape underwent a dramatic rupture following the 2021 military coup, creating one of the world's most complex environments for coordinating education aid. This brief report synthesises field‐level evidence from 2021 to 2025 to examine how international donors, UN agencies, civil society organizations, and ethnic education systems constructed adaptive coordination solutions amid political instability, insecurity, and institutional fragmentation. The report highlights key mechanisms, including the Joint Response Framework (JRF), which enabled sustained engagement with global education funds despite the collapse of formal state‐led structures. Challenges included fragmented governance, data inconsistency, limited subnational coordination, and the exclusion of localized actors. Opportunities emerged through structured pluralism, inclusive representation, and harmonized monitoring and learning systems. Insights from Myanmar offer practical lessons for strengthening coordination, neutrality, and resilience in FCAS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Htut et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4f92f03e14405aa9af6dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70087
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper