Randomized trial shows MEON N194 validates direct strong-lensing and CMB auditing, indicating potential in cosmology.
This release presents the R125–R130 master package of the Karahan-Einstein Framework / MEON V50, extending the previous galaxy-rotation and anti-cheat audit chain with direct strong-lensing and CMB validation. R125 performs a direct real-data SLACS strong-lensing audit using 43 observed lens systems. The MEON_DIRECT_N194 lens equation passes the held-out SLACS test thresholds with a test median absolute Einstein-radius error of 0.135965, a mean absolute error of 0.126607, 25% coverage of 0.846154, and test χ² = 28.274977. This supports MEON as a direct galaxy-scale strong-lensing candidate. R130_FIXED_STRICT performs a validated local Planck 2018 TT binned CMB audit. The audit uses the genuine Planck file COM_PowerSpect_CMB-TT-binned_R3.01.txt and excludes virtual environments, site-packages, SciPy test data, and old output folders. The strict audit uses 83 TT bins and passes all R130F claim checks. MEON N194 achieves a held-out reduced χ² of 1.328909, compared with ΛCDM at 1.318664, giving a MEON/ΛCDM ratio of 1.007770. In contrast, the baryon-only model gives reduced χ² = 902.763772, corresponding to a baryon/MEON ratio of 679.326753. Together, R125 and R130 show that MEON N194 passes direct SLACS strong-lensing validation and a strict local Planck TT binned CMB audit nearly at ΛCDM level, while baryon-only fails catastrophically. Scientific caution:This release does not claim a full official Planck clik TT/TE/EE likelihood replacement. R130_FIXED_STRICT is a strict local Planck TT binned audit. Full official Planck clik TT/TE/EE validation remains future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asil Karahan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: