Key result
A pharmacist-led clinical quality improvement tool and education workshop significantly decreased the QT-prolongation mean risk score by 9.14% (P=0.0244) and reduced ECG orders by 43% (P=0.003).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led clinical quality improvement tool and interprofessional education on provider knowledge and clinical practice for managing patients receiving QT-prolonging medications.
Does a pharmacist-led clinical quality improvement tool and education workshop improve provider comfort and reduce QT-prolongation risk scores in patients receiving QT-prolonging medications?
Observational (n=115)
Does a pharmacist-led clinical quality improvement tool and education workshop improve provider comfort and reduce QT-prolongation risk scores in patients receiving QT-prolonging medications?
p-value: p=0.0244
A pharmacist-led risk assessment tool and educational workshop significantly improved provider comfort and reduced QT-prolongation risk scores and unnecessary ECG orders.
Objectives To evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led clinical quality improvement tool and interprofessional education on the management of patients receiving QT-prolonging medications (QTPMs), and to implement a risk assessment and treatment algorithm incorporating alternative therapies to support best-practice prescribing decisions. Methods A pre- and post-intervention design was utilized to evaluate the impact of an interprofessional educational workshop and a clinical quality improvement tool on providers’ knowledge and clinical practice regarding QTPM management. A total of 26 providers attended and completed the pre- and post-surveys. The pre-intervention survey assessed provider knowledge and comfort in managing QTPMs. The post-intervention survey evaluated the effect of the tool on providers’ comfort and perception. A total of 148 patients under participant care were reviewed, with 115 patients aged ≥18 years and receiving QTPMs included in the analysis. Key findings A total of 26 providers attended. The percentage of providers who felt very comfortable managing patients receiving QTPMs increased (8% vs. 15%), and the percentage of providers who felt very uncomfortable reduced (8% vs. 0%). Most providers (78%) could identify lower-risk QTPMs using the intervention tool. The percentage change in the QT-prolongation mean risk score was statistically significant post-intervention (9.14% decrease; P = .0244). Furthermore, the proportion of electrocardiogram orders for patients receiving QTPMs decreased after the intervention (43% decrease; P = .003). Conclusion Implementing a pharmacist-led risk tool featuring alternative therapeutic recommendations may positively impact providers’ knowledge and clinical practice in managing QTPMs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goli et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Receiving QT-prolonging medications (n=115). Pharmacist-led clinical quality improvement tool and interprofessional education workshop vs. Pre-intervention practice was evaluated on Percentage change in the QT-prolongation mean risk score (p=0.0244). A pharmacist-led clinical quality improvement tool and education workshop significantly decreased the QT-prolongation mean risk score by 9.14% (P=0.0244) and reduced ECG orders by 43% (P=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: