Assesses heat-related emergency hospital admissions in older adults, highlighting varying risks based on characteristics.
Background Older adults are highly vulnerable to heat, yet how individual characteristics modulate its effects remains unclear. We assessed heat-related emergency hospital admission (EHA) risk across subpopulations of older adults receiving home care services in Switzerland (2019-2022).Methods We analysed patient-level EHA data linked to daily maximum temperature by MedStat regions of residence. We employed a case time series design with quasi-Poisson regression and distributed lag non-linear models to examine heat-related EHA risk, stratifying by individual characteristics, including sociodemographic factors, pre-existing health conditions, primary diagnosis, and levels of dependency and social interaction.Results The overall heat-related EHA risk was 1.12 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.20) (at 99th percentile vs minimum temperature percentile risk). Males (1.16; 1.04-1.29) generally showed higher heat-related EHA risk than females (1.09; 0.98-1.20), except among those aged ≥85 years (females 1.16; 1.00-1.34 vs males 1.06; 0.90-1.26). Regarding functional capacity, females requiring assistance with daily tasks had an increased heat-related EHA risk, whereas males showed the opposite trend, with higher risk among those who were independent. Sex-specific analyses revealed that anxiety and dementia/Alzheimer's disease were risk factors for females, whereas cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and coronary heart disease were risk factors for males. Joint stratification by pre-existing health conditions and primary diagnosis showed that individuals with pre-existing cancer had higher risks of admission for circulatory, genitourinary, infectious, and endocrine/metabolic causes during heat exposure.Conclusion Our results show that older individuals are not equally vulnerable to heat, underscoring the need for targeted public health interventions to protect high-risk older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: