Descriptive study compares hope levels regarding climate change in gifted and non-gifted students, suggesting teaching strategies.
The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the hope levels of gifted middle school students and non-gifted students regarding climate change. A descriptive research model was used in the study and qualitative data were used along with quantitative data. The participants consisted of 62 gifted middle school students receiving education at a Science and Art Center in the western region of Türkiye in the 2024-2025 academic year and a non-gifted group of 90 students receiving education at a public school in the same province. The Climate Change Hope Scale and a semi-structured interview form were employed as data collection tools in the study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted 6 students, three from the gifted and non-gifted groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using a computer program, and qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The quantitative revealed that there was no significant difference was found between the hope levels of gifted students and non-gifted student regarding preventing climate change, while the interview findings showed that gifted students had more pessimistic thoughts than non-gifted student. Based on the results suggestions for teaching content on climate change and research on climate change are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdeniz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: