Key result
Beta-blocker withdrawal during ADHF hospitalization linked to ~169% higher mortality versus continuation.
Why the study?
Handling of beta-blocker therapy during acute decompensated heart failure remains controversial, with practice variation regarding continuation versus withdrawal.
Does beta-blocker withdrawal compared to continuation increase mortality in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=71,387)
Does beta-blocker withdrawal compared to continuation increase mortality in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure?
Effect estimate: Pooled effect estimate 2.69 (95% CI 1.86-3.87)
p-value: p=<0.000001
Beta-blocker withdrawal during acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization is associated with a more than two-fold increased mortality risk, supporting guideline recommendations to continue therapy in hemodynamically stable patients.
Beta-blocker withdrawal was associated with higher mortality; challenges weak consensus against use in acute HF but leaves randomized confirmation open.
Rationale Beta-blocker therapy is a cornerstone of chronic heart failure management, yet its handling during acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains controversial, with practice variation regarding continuation versus withdrawal. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the evidence and quantify the mortality risk associated with beta-blocker withdrawal during ADHF hospitalization. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL (inception through August 2025) for studies reporting mortality outcomes for beta-blocker continuation versus withdrawal in ADHF. We extracted 13 distinct effect estimates from 10 unique studies (n = 71,387 patients), including RCTs, large registries, and prospective cohort studies. A random-effects meta-analysis using the DerSimonian-Laird method was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes. Prespecified subgroup analyses by outcome timing, study design, and effect measure were conducted to explore heterogeneity. Results Our meta-analysis demonstrated that beta-blocker withdrawal was associated with significantly increased mortality (pooled effect estimate: 2.69, 95% CI: 1.86-3.87; p < 0.000001; I²=86.3%). Prespecified subgroup analyses demonstrated substantially reduced heterogeneity: hazard ratio studies showed no heterogeneity (pooled HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.83-2.81; I²=0.0%; n = 6), as did prospective cohort studies (pooled effect: 3.38, 95% CI: 2.20-5.18; I²=0.0%; n = 3). Analysis by outcome timing revealed: in-hospital mortality (effect estimate: 4.61, 95% CI: 2.15-9.85; I²=81.0%; n = 5), short-term mortality at 30-90 days (2.05, 95% CI: 1.35-3.11; I²=23.5%; n = 3), and long-term mortality ≥6 months (2.22, 95% CI: 1.73-2.84; I²=7.8%; n = 4). Conclusions This meta-analysis of over 71,000 patients provides robust evidence that beta-blocker withdrawal during ADHF hospitalization is associated with more than two-fold increased mortality risk. The consistency of effect across high-quality study designs (I²=0% for HR studies) and outcome timepoints supports a true treatment effect rather than confounding. These findings strongly support guideline recommendations to continue beta-blocker therapy in hemodynamically stable ADHF patients and highlight the need for prospective trials evaluating optimal dosing strategies during acute decompensation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (n=71,387). Beta-blocker withdrawal vs. Beta-blocker continuation was evaluated on Mortality (Pooled effect estimate 2.69, 95% CI 1.86-3.87, p=<0.000001). Beta-blocker withdrawal during acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization was associated with significantly increased mortality (pooled effect estimate 2.69; 95% CI 1.86-3.87; p<0.000001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: