Abstract The author is the founder of the systems change organization Quark Collaboration Institute. She contends that leadership development is widely treated as a professional concern, yet one of the most consequential leadership roles in society receives little intentional support. Parenting places adults in positions of irreversible authority over developing human beings under conditions of asymmetry, uncertainty, and delayed feedback. These conditions expose leadership demands that organizations often obscure through metrics, roles, and exit options. This article reframes parenting as a leadership system that reveals what authority requires when people are still becoming, and when development, rather than efficiency defined by speed, control, certainty, or immediate results, is the appropriate measure of success. Drawing parallels to leadership transitions, promotion, and succession, it argues that curiosity, restraint, and creativity are not soft skills, but disciplined capacities for holding authority responsibly under conditions where future outcomes cannot be reliably predicted. The article further examines how prioritizing efficiency during developmental periods can erode trust, judgment, and long‐term organizational capacity. For senior leaders, parenting offers a clear lens on leadership as stewardship of power, with implications for succession, workforce retention, and the cultivation of durable leadership capacity over time.
Lin Lim (Mon,) studied this question.