Nationwide survey assesses asthma self-management behaviors and challenges in China, highlighting discrepancies between patients and physicians.
Rationale Asthma remains a major public health concern in China, with suboptimal disease control despite standardized management guidelines. Patient self-management is a cornerstone of asthma control, yet real-world evidence on its current status in China is limited. This nationwide cross-sectional study aimed to assess self-management behaviors, educational needs, and the utilization of digital tools among adolescents and adults with asthma. Methods A multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted across 29 provincial-level regions in China from 21st Oct 2023 to 15th Nov 2024, enrolling 660 physicians and 3,173 patients aged ≥14 years with diagnosed asthma. Data were collected via standardized online questionnaires. The evaluation encompassed patients’ clinical characteristics, self-management awareness, behaviors, and needs, as well as physicians’ practices in patient education. Results The overall asthma control rate was 48.4%. Within the past 12 months, 44.5% reported ≥ 1 emergency department visit or hospitalization for acute exacerbation. 37.5% had comorbidities, with allergic rhinitis the most prevalent (22.6%). Over half the patients knew the triggers, understood preventive measures, and recognized early warning signs. However, 44.5% never underwent allergen screening, and some were even unclear about its purpose. A significant disconnect was identified between patient and physician perspectives on self-management. Specifically, 58.3% of patients considered self-management “very important” (vs. 90.3% of physicians), and 54.3% self-evaluated their management as high-level (agreed by only 10.6% of physicians). Only 51.8% mastered correct inhaler technique, 26.5% proactively asked for technique verification. Regarding follow-up, 34.0% adhered to regular follow-ups every 1-3 months, and 27.3% sought consultation only upon symptoms. Despite 49.4% of physicians recommending pulmonary function tests (PFTs) every 1-6 months, only 38.2% of patients complied. Furthermore, 32.2% underwent PFTs only when symptoms occured, and 8.3% never repeated the test. 50.3% were unaware of their latest FEV1%. While 78.2% of physicians recommended the Asthma Control Test and 61.4% recommended peak-flow monitoring, only 16.4% and 11.5% of patients used these tools, respectively. Only 18.2% of patients used digital asthma management tools, but 85.8% of users found these tools very helpful. Medication reminders, inhaler use guidance, and regular follow-up reminders were the main asthma management issues that patients hoped intelligent tools could address. Conclusions This survey reveals a substantial gap between physician recommendations and patient practices in asthma self-management in China. Deficiencies in disease awareness, objective monitoring, and adherence persist. Strengthening patient education, promoting guideline-based inhaler training, and integrating digital tools could bridge these gaps and enhance asthma control. This abstract is funded by: China Association of Health Promotion and Education, and Chiesi Pharmaceutical (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: