Randomized trial evaluates seismic response of a siphon bridge under unique ground motions, suggesting design improvements.
Fault-crossing ground motions, characterized by velocity pulses, permanent fault dis-placement, and non-uniform support excitation associated with fault rupture, may significantly affect the seismic performance of siphon bridges crossing active faults. This study investigates a long-span siphon arch bridge subjected to pulse-type fault-crossing ground motions. A unified stochastic ground motion model is developed by integrating nonstationary high-frequency components based on the evolutionary power spectrum with low-frequency pulse components represented by an improved Gabor wavelet, capturing forward directivity effects, permanent displacement, and differential support input at the two sides of the fault. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model is established in OpenSees using fiber-based beam–column elements, with hydrodynamic effects incorporated through the added mass method. Parametric analyses consider pulse phase angle (0–90°), amplitude (Mw 6.0–7.5), and frequency (0–1 Hz). Results indicate that structural responses decrease with increasing phase angle, with 0° being most unfavorable, high-lighting the dominant influence of permanent displacement. Resonance amplification occurs when pulse frequencies approach the fundamental modes of the pier (0.345 Hz) and deck (0.51 Hz), while the arch is particularly sensitive near 0.439 Hz. Water added mass reduces natural frequencies by 8–14% and significantly amplifies internal forces. These findings provide guidance for seismic design of fault-crossing siphon bridges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: