Abstract Rationale Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) living in disadvantaged neighborhoods have worse composite outcomes and pulmonary function. Although the current FDA approved drugs reduce lung function decline and may improve mortality for this progressive and fatal disease, equitable access to therapy remains a challenge, which may be contributing to low antifibrotic uptake. Existing understanding of social determinants of health in IPF is derived from local registries and special subpopulations, such as Veterans. The aim of our study is to investigate the association between neighborhood-level deprivation indicators and both the distribution of patients with IPF and outcomes in a large national database. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort analysis between October 1st, 2014, and December 31st 2022, using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, a large de-identified administrative claims database. We used claims data from commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare Fee-for-Service enrollees across the United States. Diagnosis of IPF was defined using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Social deprivation index (SDI), assessed at the zip code tabulation area level, was determined based on 7 demographic characteristics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey. Patients were grouped in quintiles based on SDI at diagnosis, where higher values reflect greater deprivation. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for all-cause mortality as primary and hospitalization as secondary outcome. Results A total of 96,143 patients (mean age 75.1 years ± 6.9 years) were included in the study, 23.5% received antifibrotics. As area deprivation increased, proportion of female, Black, and Hispanic patients increased, whereas, proportion of male, White, and Asian patients decreased. Similarly, antifibrotic use declined slightly, while prescription of steroids and oxygen increased with SDI. Residing in most disadvantaged neighborhoods increased risk of hospitalization (HR, 1.13 95% CI 1.09 - 1.17 and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.15 95% CI 1.11 - 1.19) after adjusting for covariates over median follow-up of 301 days and 680 days, respectively. Conclusion Gender and racial disparities were evident among IPF patients who live in resource-limited areas. Our study shows that greater proportion of female, Black, and Hispanic IPF patients were disproportionately represented in more socioeconomically deprived areas. Furthermore, as area-level disadvantage increased, fewer patients received antifibrotics, while more patients were on steroids and oxygen therapy potentially indicating more advanced disease. Moreover, living in disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with worse all-cause mortality and hospitalizations. Identifying individuals who live in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas is essential to provide equitable care and improve outcomes for this life-threatening disease. This abstract is funded by: None
Bhatt et al. (Fri,) studied this question.