What does this research mean for the field?

The quality of randomized trial reports has significant implications for the conduct and reliability of meta-analyses. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

January 1, 1999Health Technology AssessmentOpen Access

Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

David MoherOttawa Hospital CCookRutgers, The State University of New Jersey JJadadMcMaster University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Moher et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d53f088250cfcc2a4e091 https://doi.org/10.3310/hta3120

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

January 1, 1999Health Technology AssessmentOpen Access

Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

David MoherOttawa Hospital CCookRutgers, The State University of New Jersey JJadadMcMaster University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Moher et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d53f088250cfcc2a4e091 https://doi.org/10.3310/hta3120

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark