Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic caused a decline in students’ well-being, but on the other hand, students’ experiences of online learning and studying vary widely. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between psychological flexibility and study-related burnout and to explore whether students with different levels of psychological flexibility have experienced burnout and online studying during COVID-19 differently. Methods The data was collected from first-year life-science students ( N = 296) in spring 2021. The relationship between psychological flexibility and study-related burnout was explored with Pearson’s correlation and linear regression. Students’ open-ended responses about their experiences of online learning were analyzed with inductive content analysis and the categories were quantified. Three different groups (high, middle, and low) were made based on respondents’ psychological flexibility, and the differences in their study-related burnout were analysed with ANOVA and Tukey’s test, and differences in online learning experiences were analysed with a Chi-square test. Results The results showed that there was a negative relationship between psychological flexibility and study-related burnout. In addition, experiences of study-related burnout and online studying differed statistically significantly between the different groups. Discussion The results show that psychological flexibility is an important factor in enhancing students’ well-being and learning during the pandemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asikainen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: