Key result
Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting significantly improved the corrected TIMI frame count from 17.1 pre-stenting to 7.8 post-stenting (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting improve the corrected TIMI frame count in stable cardiac patients with chronically diseased coronary arteries?
Observational
Does percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting improve the corrected TIMI frame count in stable cardiac patients with chronically diseased coronary arteries?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.8% vs 17.1%
p-value: p=<0.01
Coronary artery stenosis greater than 75% significantly impairs resting blood flow as measured by cTFC, which improves significantly following stenting, suggesting early hyperaemia.
Supports stenting for flow restoration in chronic stenosis; hypothesis-generating pending randomized outcome trials.
UNLABELLED: The impact of chronic coronary obstructions on resting blood flow in stable cardiac patients and the response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the TIMI frame count method has not been well documented. We studied the impact of coronary artery stenosis severity on the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) in chronically stenosed coronary arteries. We prospectively and quantitatively determined the impact of stenting on the cTFC during elective PCI. METHODS: In substudy 1, analysis was performed to obtain the mean cTFC for arteries with <50% stenosis (Group A), 51-75% stenosis (Group B), 76-85% stenosis (Group C1), 86-95% stenosis (Group C2) and 96-99% stenosis (Group C3). In substudy 2, the cTFC and quantitative coronary angiography were performed pre- and post-PCI. RESULTS: In substudy 1, the cTFC increased exponentially beyond a diameter stenosis of 75% (P < 0.01). However there was no significant difference in the cTFC for coronary arteries with <75% stenosis. In substudy 2, the overall pre- and poststenting cTFC was 17.1 +/- 11.7 and 7.8 +/- 2.7 (P < 0.01) and the TFC index [calculated by dividing the mean cTFC for the relevant artery by the mean cTFC for the corresponding coronary artery in a previously derived control group in our laboratory] was 1.6 +/- 1 and 0.7 +/- 0.2 (P = < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that there was a significant increase in the cTFC when the coronary artery stenosis was more than 75% reflecting significant flow abnormalities at this degree of stenosis in chronically diseased coronary arteries. Following stenting there is a significant improvement in the cTFC, which is better than the cTFC for arteries with normal flow, suggesting early hyperaemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vijayalakshmi et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Stable cardiac patients with chronically diseased coronary arteries. Percutaneous coronary intervention (stenting) vs. Pre-stenting (baseline) was evaluated on Corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) (p=<0.01). Percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting significantly improved the corrected TIMI frame count from 17.1 pre-stenting to 7.8 post-stenting (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: