As represented in papers by Cartwright and Harary, Abelson and Rosenberg, and Lambert, current formalizations of interpersonal equilibrium theory characterize balanced systems of individual orientation as two-valued. Within this very restricted characterization of balance, we show that ordinary logic must yield the same conclusions as “psycho-logic.” We cite some dissatisfaction with the restricted applicability of this sort of equilibrium theory. Finally, we urge that current equilibrium theory be considered a special case of a more general theory encompassing response spaces with a dimensionality greater than one, and we sketch an approach to building such a theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Runkel et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: