Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We reviewed recent literature on studies with external radiation or prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer considering the definitions of ‘local recurrence’ and ‘disease-free survival’ and the reporting of patients lost to follow-up. Among studies evaluating external radiation, 5/17 (29%) mention that prostate biopsy is used for some patients in determinating local recurrence, versus 6/11 (55%) for prostatectomy. Several studies, 15/28 (54%), present figures for disease-free survival without giving a definition of the parameter. In the majority of the reports no comments are made relative to patients lost to follow-up. Three authors consider patients lost to follow-up as dead with disease. Considerations regarding ‘local recurrence’ and ‘disease-free survival’ warrant caution in the interpretation of data based on such parameters. In a comparison of non-randomized studies of localized prostate cancer, cancer-specific survival with prostate cancer death defined as ‘death with diagnosed distant metastases’ may be a robust parameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steineck et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: