Key result
Asymmetric commissural angles in functional BAVs reduce aortic opening area and elevate wall shear stress.
Why the study?
How natural variation of the commissural angle in functionally bicuspid aortic valves influences hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics is not fully understood.
How does the variation in commissural angle in functionally bicuspid aortic valves influence hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics?
How does the variation in commissural angle in functionally bicuspid aortic valves influence hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics?
Asymmetric commissural angles in functionally bicuspid aortic valves lead to adverse hemodynamics and increased leaflet stress, potentially predisposing to valve deterioration and aortic dilation.
Asymmetric angles may promote valve deterioration and aortopathy; animal data leave open human translation and therapeutic targeting.
In subjects with functionally bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) with fusion between the coronary leaflets, there is a natural variation of the commissural angle. What is not fully understood is how this variation influences the hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics. These variables may influence valvar durability and function, both in the native valve and following repair, and influence ongoing aortic dilation. A 3D aortic valvar model was reconstructed from a patient with a normal trileaflet aortic valve using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations were used to compare the effects of the varying commissural angles between the non-coronary with its adjacent coronary leaflet. The results showed that the BAV with very asymmetric commissures (120∘ degree commissural angle) reduces the aortic opening area during peak systole and with a jet that impacts on the right posterior wall proximally of the ascending aorta, giving rise to elevated wall shear stress. This manifests in a shear layer with a retrograde flow and strong swirling towards the fused leaflet side. In contrast, a more symmetrical commissural angle (180∘ degree commissural angle) reduces the jet impact on the posterior wall and leads to a linear decrease in stress and strain levels in the non-fused non-coronary leaflet. These findings highlight the importance of considering the commissural angle in the progression of aortic valvar stenosis, the regional distribution of stresses and strain levels experienced by the leaflets which may predispose to valvar deterioration, and progression in thoracic aortic dilation in patients with functionally bicuspid aortic valves. Understanding the hemodynamics and biomechanics of the functionally bicuspid aortic valve and its variation in structure may provide insight into predicting the risk of aortic valve dysfunction and thoracic aortic dilation, which could inform clinical decision making and potentially lead to improved aortic valvar surgical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sundström et al. (2023) studied Functionally bicuspid aortic valves (n=1). Variation in commissural angle (120 degree vs 180 degree) was evaluated on Hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics (aortic opening area, wall shear stress, stress and strain levels). A very asymmetric commissural angle (120 degrees) in functionally bicuspid aortic valves reduces aortic opening area and elevates wall shear stress compared to a symmetrical 180-degree angle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: