Key result
In patients with severe aortic stenosis diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography, an Energy Loss Coefficient >1.0 cm2 was associated with a significantly lower incidence of symptoms (14% vs 81%, p=0.002).
Why the study?
Does the energy loss coefficient (ELCo) improve the assessment of aortic stenosis severity compared to Doppler effective orifice area (EOADop) in patients with severe AS?
Population
33 patients with severe aortic stenosis by Doppler examination referred to the cardiac catheterization…
Comparison
Assessment of aortic stenosis severity using the… vs Assessment of aortic stenosis severity using…
Design
Cross-sectional, Cardiac catheterization was performed by 2 experienced…
Authors
Loading...
ELCo may aid symptom risk stratification in severe AS; leaves open whether it improves grading over EOADop pending prospective validation.
Observational (n=33)
No
Does the energy loss coefficient (ELCo) improve the assessment of aortic stenosis severity compared to Doppler effective orifice area (EOADop) in patients with severe AS?
Absolute Event Rate: 14% vs 81%
p-value: p=0.002
The energy loss coefficient (ELCo) provides a more accurate assessment of aortic stenosis severity than standard Doppler effective orifice area by accounting for pressure recovery, reclassifying 21% of 'severe' AS patients to moderate AS.
Kume et al. (2008) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=33). Energy Loss Coefficient (ELCo) > 1.0 cm2 vs. Energy Loss Coefficient (ELCo) ≤ 1.0 cm2 was evaluated on Incidence of symptoms related to aortic stenosis (dyspnea, angina pectoris, syncope) (p=0.002). In patients with severe aortic stenosis diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography, an Energy Loss Coefficient >1.0 cm2 was associated with a significantly lower incidence of symptoms (14% vs 81%, p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: