Key result
Three Strong for Surgery risk factors linked to ~156% higher 30-day mortality vs zero factors.
Why the study?
The potential impact of Strong for Surgery bundled risk factors on outcomes after major surgery had not been previously studied.
Does a higher number of Strong for Surgery (S4S) risk factors increase the risk of complications and mortality after major elective surgery in the VA population?
Cohort (n=31,285)
Yes
Does a higher number of Strong for Surgery (S4S) risk factors increase the risk of complications and mortality after major elective surgery in the VA population?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The presence of bundled modifiable risk factors (smoking, poor glycemic control, and suboptimal nutritional status) is associated with a progressively escalating risk of postoperative mortality and complications in patients undergoing major elective surgery.
BACKGROUND: Strong for Surgery (S4S) is a public health campaign focused on optimizing patient health prior to surgery by identifying evidence-based modifiable risk factors. The potential impact of S4S bundled risk factors on outcomes after major surgery has not been previously studied. This study tested the hypothesis that a higher number of S4S risk factors is associated with an escalating risk of complications and mortality after major elective surgery in the VA population. METHODS: The Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent major non-emergent general, thoracic, vascular, urologic, and orthopedic surgeries between the years 2008 and 2015. Patients with complete data pertaining to S4S risk factors, specifically preoperative smoking status, HbA1c level, and serum albumin level, were stratified by number of positive risk factors, and perioperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 31,285 patients comprised the study group, with 16,630 (53.2%) patients having no S4S risk factors (S4S0), 12,323 (39.4%) having one (S4S1), 2,186 (7.0%) having two (S4S2), and 146 (0.5%) having three (S4S3). In the S4S1 group, 60.3% were actively smoking, 35.2% had HbA1c > 7, and 4.4% had serum albumin < 3. In the S4S2 group, 87.8% were smokers, 84.8% had HbA1c > 7, and 27.4% had albumin < 3. Major complications, reoperations, length of stay, and 30-day mortality increased progressively from S4S0 to S4S3 groups. S4S3 had the greatest adjusted mortality risk (adjusted odds radio [AOR] 2.56, p = 0.04) followed by S4S2 (AOR 1.58, p = 0.02) and S4S1 (AOR 1.34, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In the VA population, patients who had all three S4S risk factors, namely active smoking, suboptimal nutritional status, and poor glycemic control, had the greatest risk of postoperative mortality compared to patients with fewer S4S risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liou et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Major elective surgery (n=31,285). Strong for Surgery (S4S) risk factors vs. No S4S risk factors (S4S0) was evaluated on 30-day mortality (AOR 2.56, p=0.04). Having three Strong for Surgery risk factors (active smoking, HbA1c > 7, albumin < 3) was associated with the greatest adjusted 30-day mortality risk compared to zero risk factors (AOR 2.56, p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: