Key result
Transcatheter mitral valve repair is linked to ~61% less major bleeding and fewer complications versus surgery.
Why the study?
Whether age and comorbidities impact the inpatient safety outcomes of TMVR versus SMVR was unknown.
Does transcatheter mitral valve repair improve inpatient safety outcomes, length of stay, and discharge disposition compared to surgical mitral valve repair in patients with varying age and comorbidity burdens?
Observational (n=8,716)
Yes
Does transcatheter mitral valve repair improve inpatient safety outcomes, length of stay, and discharge disposition compared to surgical mitral valve repair in patients with varying age and comorbidity burdens?
Effect estimate: OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.32-0.47)
TMVR is associated with fewer inpatient complications, shorter length of stay, and better discharge disposition compared to SMVR, with the relative safety benefit being most pronounced in older patients and those with a higher comorbidity burden.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) has shown to be a safe and effective treatment option for symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are at prohibitive surgical risk. Whether age and comorbidities impact the inpatient safety outcomes of TMVR versus surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) is unknown. METHODS: Using the national inpatient sample, patients undergoing either elective TMVR or SMVR between 2012 and 2015 were analyzed. Logistic, generalized logistic, and linear regression were used to compare inpatient complications, discharge disposition, and length of stay (LOS). Heterogeneity in the effect of TMVR versus SMVR across Charlson comorbidity index (CCI, categorized as <2 and ≥2) and age (categorized as <75 years old and ≥75 years old) were assessed for effect modification. RESULTS: Overall, 8,716 hospitalizations were included, 7,950 (91%) SMVR and 766 (9%) TMVR. Compared with SMVR, patients undergoing TMVR were older (median age 79 vs. 62 years) and more likely to be female (45% vs. 40%) with a higher CCI score (median CCI 2 vs. 1). Despite being older with a higher comorbidity burden, patients undergoing TMVR had a lower incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.50), cerebrovascular accidents (OR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.92), and major bleeding (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.47). TMVR patients were also discharged 3 days earlier (CIE -3.26; 95% CI: -3.72, -2.80) and were less likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55, 0.93). Additionally, the relative reduction in complications after TMVR versus SMVR was significantly higher in older (age ≥75 years) and more comorbid (CCI ≥2) patients (p for interaction <.05 for both). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with TMVR, as compared with SMVR, were older and had more comorbidities, but had a lower incidence of inpatient complications, shorter LOS, and better discharge disposition. Therefore, TMVR may be a safer option than SMVR in older patients and those with a higher burden of comorbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jogu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Severe mitral regurgitation (n=8,716). Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) vs. Surgical mitral valve repair (SMVR) was evaluated on Inpatient complications (including major bleeding) (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32-0.47). Transcatheter mitral valve repair was associated with lower odds of major bleeding (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.32-0.47), cerebrovascular accidents, and pacemaker implantation compared to surgical repair.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: